Posts tagged "html"
Modern browsers can display exciting visual effects such as drop shadows
(without the use of background images). CSS3 makes it possible to turn
submit inputs and even links into rich, Aqua-like buttons in these
browsers (alternative style rules can be provided for older browsers).

I began this post three months ago, got stuck, and put it in the too hard
basket. I wanted to devise a workable solution to my stumbling block before
publishing this information. I'm getting ahead of myself, though. First, the
background.
As I began writing this post, I had just completed a redesign of this
site. The new design removed unnecessary distractions to allow readers
to focus on the clearly presented content. I moved site navigation
from the sidebar (which I axed altogether) to the header. I decided to
fix the header in place so that the navigation and search form would
always be visible. This required very little effort, but overcoming the
problem posed by fixed-position headers took a great deal of trial
and error. To save others from going through this tortuous process I'll
describe my various approaches, and list the benefits and drawbacks
of each.
Sticky footers should be ubiquitous. They are not.
This leads me to believe that many developers are unaware of how to prevent
footers from floating up on pages without much content.
In my post titled Captions over images I advocate the use of
definition lists for captioning images. Earlier today I was asked
whether this meaningful markup could be used in conjunction with an
"image slider" such as Easy Slider 1.5.
I had a look at the Easy Slider source code and decided to write my own
image slider using Prototype rather than hacking someone else's code to
pieces. It's a proof of concept rather than a full-blown "plugin", but
it demonstrates that such functionality is achievable using elegant,
meaningful markup.
Check out the Prototype image slider demo to see the code in action.
There are blog posts all over the Web explaining how to write valid XHTML
markup to embed YouTube videos. There are also a number of online converters
that generate this markup automatically.
I've always found it easier to write the markup myself, as there's really
nothing to it. Simply replace both instances of video_id in the following
code with — you guessed it — the video's ID.
<object class="youtube"
type="application/x-shockwave-flash"
data="http://www.youtube.com/v/video_id&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0">
<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/video_id&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0" />
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" />
</object>
rel=0 is often useful to include (as I've done in the example above) as it
prevents thumbnails for related videos from being displayed at the end of the
clip.
One important point to remember when you're "rolling your own" markup is that
the character entity & must be used for all ampersands.
Finally, be aware of the fact that it's possible to change the size of the
YouTube object using CSS. There's no need to include the width and height
attributes in the markup.
object.youtube
{
width: 100%;
height: 385px;
}
This is my response to Chris Coyier's screencast titled
jQuery Part 3 – Image Title Plugin which I watched a couple of days ago.
Something didn't sit right with me at the time, and I've now worked out what
it was: JavaScript is not required!
I'll present a JavaScript-free approach for displaying captions over images
that uses truly meaningful markup.
Recently I've been on a mission to minimize the number of HTTP requests made
while loading pages on this site. Until yesterday, the archives page was
making an HTTP request for each of the tiny calendar icons used on the
page. Therefore, up to 31 HTTP requests were required just to retrieve the
calendar icons. Not good.
The same result can be achieved with a single HTTP request through the use of
a sprite:

- Tiny calendar icons sprite, which you're welcome to save and use
Hooray! It's now possible to insert images into Gmail messages.
About time, I say.

- Gmail's insert image icon, visible in rich formatting mode
Today I noticed that a page on this site failed validation.
W3C's markup validation service gave the following error:
element "strike" undefined
<strike> is not valid XHTML; I'd forgotten the correct XHTML markup for
this purpose:
my favourite colour is <del>red</del> <ins>white</ins>
The above gives: my favourite colour is red white
It's a good idea to explicitly define the appearance of deleted and inserted
text in your style sheet:
del { text-decoration: line-through; }
ins { text-decoration: underline; }